Strategy worksheets were completed individually by each member of the group. The meeting with Dr. Sanders helped to clarify some issues I was wondering about the project; I was planning on doing a whole lot more than what was required! Instead of creating a PPT tutorial for all different types of technology that the teachers would be using for this logic model, I am just going to focus on a single technology based on Dr. Sanders' suggestions. I will also be completing an example PPT of what a student product will look like at the very end of this logic model project, incorporating all the other lessons that Katie, Lila, and Tara will be creating. I feel that we have a certain product in mind, and we want others to be able to see exact outcome; it may help see how all the lessons interconnect.
The only issue I am having at the moment is still with the IMPACT Panel "discussion" (not) taking place in AET Zone. The revised logic model was posted on October 30. On November 14, one participant finally posted, and basically regurgitated everything we had already said about our logic model. Yes, we planned to use 7th grade as we clearly said in the very first line of the description!! There is no "guessing" involved here. The participant's post was also full of typos. I can understand left out words (I am sure I've done the same in this blog!) and little mistakes, but when there are several mistakes that could have been fixed by simply proofreading before you post, it looks very unprofessional...(My grae team plans many unitws?)
I know Lila and Katie's group is faring about the same as ours. There is such a mismatch of expectations among the different groups, it isn't funny. It would be very interesting to hear what they thought of the project versus what we thought of it. It is an awesome idea, if only everyone would pull their weight and contribute in a timely manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment